Lawsuit Against Online Dating Sites App Grindr Dismissed Under Section 2of the Communications
Area 230 regarding the Communications Decency Act continues to behave among the strongest protections that are legal social media marketing businesses need to don’t be saddled with crippling harm honors based on the misdeeds of their users.
The strong defenses afforded by Section 230(c) were recently reaffirmed by Judge Caproni for the Southern District of New York, in Herrick v. Grindr. The scenario involved a dispute involving the networking that is social Grindr as well as an individual who had been maliciously targeted through the working platform by their former fan. For the unknown, Grindr is mobile app directed to gay and bisexual guys that, making use of geolocation technology, assists them in order to connect with other users that are situated nearby.
Plaintiff Herrick alleged that his ex-boyfriend put up several profiles that are fake Grindr that claimed to be him. More than a thousand users responded to the impersonating profiles. Herrick’s ex‑boyfriend, pretending to be Herrick, would direct the men then to Herrick’s’ work-place and house. The ex-boyfriend, still posing as Herrick, would additionally inform these would-be suitors that Herrick had particular rape fantasies, that he would initially resist their overtures, and they should attempt to overcome Herrick’s initial refusals.